What to (not) say to a person experiencing grief

Our society likes to have things ordered, packaged, and controlled. This bleeds into our understanding and analysis of the grieving process. Most people are probably familiar with the “5 stages of grief” model (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance) and think that people pass through these stages like clockwork within a year-long time frame. Only during this period does the grieving person have permission to feel the loss. After a year, the person has a societal obligation to return to the normal, compartmentalized life of a non-grieving person. From my experience, I have never denied the loss of my mother, nor have I tried to “bargain” her way back into my life. And I certainly never felt anger about it until a few months ago, way after the immediate acceptance and depression I experienced after the loss that happened four years ago. I think it’s safe to say that most people who have experienced a deeply personal loss would agree that trying to process their grief through a 5-stage process is, for lack of a better word, crap.

Grieving is a lifelong journey that affects people in different ways and appears during different stages of life. Every person's context and situation surrounding the loss of their loved one is completely unique. We should never generalize, summarize, stereotype, or otherwise reduce someone's experience to a 5-step process. At the same time, it is important to recognize that people DO grieve in this pattern. Some people may not even feel any of the stages, and may not grieve in any sense that we understand. The point I’m trying to make is that ALL types of grieving are real and legitimate reactions to a traumatic event.

Unfortunately, because our culture fears death and prefers to avoid confronting the deep, ugly, raw emotions of complete defeat, hopelessness, fear, loneliness, and chaos that come from experiencing the death of a loved one, this 5-step process emerged as a way of managing the discomfort of confronting those emotions. As a result, many people who have not directly experienced this type of pain are, forgive me, a bit clueless when it comes to knowing how to comfort and support those who want it.

       When the time comes for you to support a loved one, friend, etc., below are some suggestions for what to avoid and ideas for what you could say instead. These examples are often the "go-to” phrases that most people use in a conversation about a lost loved one. While they come from a good place, I don’t believe they are the most effective ways of offering support. Sometimes they can even do more harm than good. Please take these ideas with a grain of salt. No one is the same: people respond in different ways to diverse approaches of support. These “tips” stem from my experience. As you read along, I hope you understand why the alternative options may be better. Maybe you can use them the next time you need to offer support.

Don't say...
"You are so strong."
        This is probably the most common phrase I heard come out of people's mouths, especially when I was crying uncontrollably. When a person is feeling so weak, defeated, and helpless that they are crying in front of another, probably the last thing they want to hear is a reminder of what they have to do every single day. For me, I feel like I have to be strong all the time, everyday. Frankly, it's a relief when I can breakdown and cry and ignore the constant expectation to be strong so that other people don’t have to deal with confronting the reality of grief and sadness. Telling someone they are strong when clearly in that moment they are not, can be annoying, and worse, damaging. If someone is being fed the message that they are not allowed to be weak, it pushes vulnerability aside, which then results in pushing emotions aside and thinking that their friends don't want to see them in any state but the "strong" one. It is okay for people to cry and show emotion. Strength is one of many traits people may gain from experiencing loss.
Instead, say...
"When [X] happened, how did you feel?"
This allows the person to explain their feelings instead of you telling them what it is they should feel. The best thing you can do is try to help the other person articulate the feelings they have. A lot of times, there simply are no words to describe the emotions! Sometimes they just need to feel them and the only way to express them is through crying, laughter, silence, or anger (but never let a grieving person take their anger out on you). Give the other person a chance to articulate their own experience for themselves. It is difficult! Be there and listen actively.

Don't say...
"God/Life has a reason for everything."
"God never gives you more than you can handle."
At the risk of being controversial, I’m putting this out there. These two spiritual phrases can be iffy for 3 reasons: 1) Are you God? Do you have such a connection with the almighty, omniscient being that you can actually tell normal people what God actually thinks and why God acts? I didn't think so! So please stop acting as if you know what God is doing. (Sorry not sorry if that offends) 2) If someone has a strong sense of faith or spirituality, the repetitive use of the first phrase may start to make the grieving person think that God did this to them on purpose as a punishment. I shouldn't have to go in depth as to why this is a toxic way of thinking. 3) The 2nd phrase has similar effects to the "You are so strong" phrase. If God gave you what you can handle, why are you feeling this way? People need to feel pain and hit rock bottom. It has nothing to do with their character or the strength of their faith. Feelings are a gift from God (or biology, however you want to think about it) whether we like it or not, and it’s important to validate them as real and legitimate.
Instead, say...
"Does going to church/prayer help you?"
"Do you want me to come with you to church/a concert/the park?"
"Would you like to do [activity]?"
Ask them what specific things help. If they do not know what helps, which may well be the case, be the person who is willing to try things out with them and if they feel the need to leave, leave with them. Asking for what specific things you can do to help, and not dismissing their feelings to God, is a concrete and tangible way a grieving person can feel comforted and supported.

Don't say...
"I remember when my [dog/fish/3rd-cousin-twice-removed] died. It was awful."
This phrase is probably meant to connect your experience with theirs and comfort them, knowing that they are not the only ones who have felt loss. I'm sorry, I know losing pets and distant relatives is awful, and even losing parents in their 90's is awful. But it simply is not the same as losing a parent or a sibling or a child when they are young or middle aged. Every grief is different. This phrase merely turns the focus of the conversation from the grieving person to you. This sometimes prompts the other person to comfort YOU instead, when in this moment it clearly should be the other way around.
However!! If you have lived through a similar situation, someone's dad died at 15 and your dad died when you were around the same age, it can be an IMMENSE comfort knowing someone has gone through a similar situation. It just takes some tact to know when to tell them, so that again they don't feel the need to comfort you.
Instead, say...
"I don't know how you feel, but I want to try to understand and be there for you."
It’s perfectly okay to admit your own ignorance. It shows the person that you are humble. The second part, “I want to try to understand and be there for you”, again places the focus back on the person you are comforting and gives them the chance to tell you how they feel and what they might need. It lets them know you are truly invested in helping them throughout the journey in the months and years to come.

Don't say...
"I'm sure they're watching over you right now."
"They're always with you."
This one may seem surprising. This phrase does absolutely nothing for me. The usual response I want to say is "Yeah, she's always with me even when I shower and pee and spend time with my friends getting drunk at a bar," but I hold my tongue so I don't sound sarcastic and dismissive of their attempt to comfort me. The whole point of grieving and feeling loss is processing the fact that the lost loved one IS NOT THERE. They are NOT HERE. Any attempt to lessen that fact of the matter is, to me, dismissive to the immense feeling of loss that the grieving person is feeling.
Instead, say...
"I always remember your [lost loved one] when I [insert activity or memory here]."
This phrase is immensely comforting. It reminds the grieving person that other people do still think about the lost loved one and that the memory of the lost person won't fade out instantly. One of the only ways dead people exist in life is through memories, and that is one of the hardest thing to come to terms with. Having an idea about how others remember the lost person allows the grieving person to remember them in more ways than their own, often complex, memories. Never try to tell the grieving person how they should remember their lost loved one. This brings me to the…dun dun dun…worst thing you could say:

Please never say this...
"You should start seeing the positive of this situation."
This is completely, utterly, and frankly rude. This may seem like you are trying to tell the grieving person that you have their best interests at heart and hate to see them in pain, but it does nothing of the sort. It completely dismisses their pain and signals to the grieving person that they should never feel pain associated with grieving from here on out. It also reveals that you really do not care about the person's feelings and that you do not want to be around them when they are not happy and positive. If you do not want to "deal with" a grieving person, this is a tactless and insensitive phrase to use to signal to them that you don't care.
Instead, say...
Nothing.
If you cannot promise to the person that you can be there for them, don't! People grieving need to know who they can count on. If you know that you do not want to support this person, then don't give false hope and tell them you will. If you still want to be a good person, refer them to people who know them better. It's not a bad thing to admit that you don't feel equipped to help, just like it’s perfectly okay to admit your own ignorance. Humility is a good thing.

Three more things I want to say:
My blog post is not the only article about ways to help a grieving person. Do your research online. If you know the person really well, you should be a bit familiar with what could work and what wouldn't work.

To the grieving person: don’t be afraid to let your close friends know what does and doesn’t work for you! It’s really hard to ask for specifically what you need. It’s tempting to accept any and all help, even if it’s not the help you need. Instead, think about ways you can let others know what you need to hear and feel from your friends.

Finally, please remember that not everyone is the same, and therefore everyone’s grieving journeys will differ. Empathy, time, and patience are what you truly need.


Living Museums

          Oftentimes we learn about horrifying things that happen in the world, go to a museum or monument to learn about it, try to make it more accessible to our personal lives, and maybe gain a shred of sympathy. We return to our comfortable lives and maintain a separation: a mentality that whatever story being told "belongs" in a museum and doesn't exist in the real world. But the stories of Chile are not locked in a museum, they live and breathe in the streets everyday.
          I had the opportunity to talk with some individuals about their experiences before, during, and after the dictatorship in Chile. Here are two anecdotes I remember clearly:
           Someone who was a child during during the dictatorship lived in a house with pillars in front of it. The military would use them for cover if there was gunfire in the streets. Her mother would put her in the bathtub to ensure that no stray bullets would hit her through the walls. It sounded like this happened on more than one occasion.
          I spoke with someone else, an adult during the dictatorship, who told me that she was making her way home from a party with a friend. They were in the street after the toque de queda (curfew), and they ran into a truck full of the military. They were stopped, and she was accompanied home by a soldier. She never saw her friend again and, to this day, has no idea what happened to him.
          The conversations were never planned, the stories would rise up in conversation and drift away as the topic was changed. I have no way of empathizing or relating to what they were saying; I had no idea how to respond, if I even should respond, and I would wonder how many more stories are told everyday or waiting to be discovered. I think the best thing to do with situations you can't understand is just listen and try in whatever way to place yourself in their shoes, in their life, in that moment.
          Parents of children who lived this reality desperately want a better future for their children, and want to ensure that their lives are easier than their own. I noticed that in the classroom, students were extremely insecure and did not trust their own decisions. I talked with the teacher I helped about this, wondering if there was more to this issue than what I saw on the surface (lack of motivation to learn English). She responded immediately that a lot of it has to do with the way parents are raising their children in the aftermath of their experiences living through the dictatorship. They want their children to have easier lives, and ensure they never have to live anything close to what they experienced. In my school, one way this appeared was through ensuring their children had an "easy" time through high school. It's not my place to answer these questions (is it even my place to ask them in this context?): to what extent can you shelter your children from the world? Do children learn best from their own experiences, or from stories told? How can we ensure that our children live comfortable lives, but maintain work ethic, empathy, and the desire to help others?
          In my place in life, I'm just starting to consider these questions, and maybe I'll have a tiny answer in 10 or so years. Until then, I can only ponder...
A few of my students!


Sprawling City, Limited Connection

          It's hard to talk to a Chilean on the street, especially in Santiago. The teacher I was assisting said that this is because Chileans like having a low-profile, since they are naturally isolated from the rest of the world with mountains and ocean. It's comfortable to be used to your own people and not open up to strangers easily, and being in a huge city makes it that much easier: you can be anonymous. That anonymity puts up a wall and makes it harder to see those walking down the street as people just like yourself, wandering around wondering what to do with their lives.
          This is mainly why I became much more critical of Santiago during my second round in Chile. It also may have been because I was there during the winter, when the skies are a constant, suffocating, polluted gray. That environment would make anyone exhausted. Whenever I would get on the metro, I would mostly see detached, angry faces avoiding eye contact. I learned that few people are here because they actually love the city. Santiago is where all the opportunities are: the jobs with money, the best universities, and semi-accessible quality healthcare. I've never heard of a country that is so centralized: all of the government and institutions that offer a shred of social mobility are trapped in one place. For example, university students hoping to move upward in social class are often those who already have the means to do so; travel expenses, living expenses, and tuition at the highest quality universities make it nearly impossible for the lower class to get an elite education. So Santiago is the most attractive for those looking to move up but repellent to those who have been there for a long time, and it creates a weird dynamic that I couldn't wrap my head around in the limited time I was living as a semi-real person this time around. There's always more to learn, and it makes me sad I wasn't there longer to understand this dynamic better.
          One thing I learned about myself: I love to strike up conversations with strangers in line, smile and make eye contact with people I walk by, and laugh on the street for no reason. That, to me, is home and how I truly want to live.
Santiago as viewed from the Saltos de Apoquindo trail